Edward Winter vs Xing Dao Chen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 12:34 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Winter vs X. Dao Chen

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Winter 1 - 0 Chen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Edward Winter winning 2 and Xing Dao Chen winning 0. The last match between Edward Winter and Xing Dao Chen was at the M15 Wuning, 06-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Edward Winter getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Winter | 1 |
| Chen | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Wuning(08-06-25)
E. Winter vs X. D. Chen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $118,500 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.05% (101-73) | Career Total W/L | 56.10% (69-54) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Winter vs X. D. Chen Match Preview:
- How effective is Chen on their second serve? Chen has secured 40.8% of points, while Winter leads slightly with 44.33% in recent form.
- Who excels more in return games? Chen outperforms with 48.9% of points won on opponents' second serve compared to Winter's 45.13%.
- A closer look at first serve return stats: Winter holds the edge with 29.56%, surpassing Chen's 25.27%.
- Under pressure, who saves more breakpoints? Winter has a robust rate of 59.22%, exceeding Chen's 52.11%.
- Performance overview within the last year shows Winter with a slight lead, winning 57.38% of matches versus Chen's 55.74%.
- Evaluating their best surfaces, both excel on indoor hard courts, though Chen tops with a 64% win rate compared to Winter's 60%.
- What about the quality of opponents faced? Chen has encountered tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 226.7, while Winter's opponents averaged 399.8.
- In deciding sets, Chen leads significantly, clinching 59% of these critical games, compared to Winter's 44%.
- On breakpoint conversion, Chen again shows prowess, converting 32.35% of opportunities, whereas Winter manages 29.38%.
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head metrics reflect a closely matched contest, yet there are standout elements tipping the scales. Chen displays excellence in return games, particularly against second serves, giving them a tactical edge.
Despite Winter’s stronger breakpoint saving rate, Chen’s capability to clinch deciding sets indicates resilience under pressure. This, coupled with Chen’s high breakpoint conversion, suggests a propensity to capitalize at crucial moments.
Taking into account the tougher opponents Chen has faced, along with their overall performance and surface proficiency, Chen appears well-positioned to secure victory in this upcoming match.
Edward Winter vs Xing Dao Chen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Winter vs X. D. Chen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:24:52 | Average Match Time | 1:24:52 |
| 70% (33/47) | 1st Serve % | 60% (25/42) |
| 79% (26/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (13/25) |
| 43% (6/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (4/17) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 60% (25/42) | Return Points Win % | 32% (15/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Winter Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
F | L | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | ||
SF | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
X. D. Chen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(7) 3-6 7-6(2) | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

E. Winter vs X. D. Chen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.05% (101/73) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.10% (69/54) |
| 57.84% (225/164) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.55% (150/125) |
| 54.15% (1972/1670) | Games Win/Loss | 52.87% (1336/1191) |
| 59.21% (90/62) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.14% (56/42) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.54% (8/5) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 312 | Aces Total | 78 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 478 | Total Double Faults | 246 |
| 1:38:40 | Average Match Time | 1:14:55 |
| 408.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 258.07 |
| 65% (7004/10746) | 1st Serve % | 66% (3260/4924) |
| 68% (4730/7004) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2028/3260) |
| 51% (1894/3742) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (763/1664) |
| 41% (503/1213) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (240/555) |
| 41% (4472/10779) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2120/5068) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.16% (22/21) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 63.11% (77/45) | Futures W/L | 58.47% (69/49) |
| 58% (100/173) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (64/117) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 54% (28/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (9/24) |
| 43% (17/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 85% (105/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (68/58) |
| 15% (105/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (68/10) |
| 17% (69/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (55/10) |